Proof That 9/11 Was An Inside Job - The Truth About The World Trade Center Attacks

9/11 was an inside job, and I intend to prove it to you. Usually, when someone starts to talk about how they think that 9/11 was a staged event or false flag operation, they are met with cries that they are nuts or worse.

Some even go as far as calling participants in the 9/11 truth movement domestic terrorists. However, I challenge you to investigate the evidence for yourself, because NOBODY believes the official story that was produced by the 9/11 commission.

In fact, a few members of the commission came out saying that they were met with opposition at every turn, and that they were censored and unable to properly perform their investigations.

What's so hard to believe about this? Our government and other governments from around the world have been performing and planning false flag or "black flag" operations for centuries. Much of this information is now declassified. In other words, we know these things to be fact.

The "jihadists" that supposedly carried out these attacks were CIA assets. This is now declassified information. The CIA has admitted that Mohammed Atta and a few others were CIA assets.

Several of them, including Atta, had even received special U.S. military training. Atta, being a CIA asset would be under constant and secret surveillance.

Other CIA assets, including Susan Lindauer, have stated that it would have been utterly impossible for Atta and others to have been planning an attack of any kind without the CIA knowing about it.

Furthermore, Atta and others did not behave like Islamic fundamentalists. They were said to frequent bars and strip clubs. They chased women, and generally conducted themselves in ways that fundamentalist jihadists simply would not. If anything, Atta and friends were moderates - not fundamentalists intent on jihad.

The twin World Trade Center towers were designed to withstand multiple impacts of the largest commercial airliners in production at the time - the Boeing 707.

The official story in the 9/11 Commission Report was that the towers would not have been brought down by the impact of the airliners alone (true), but that the collapse of the buildings was due to burning jet fuel that melted the steel infrastructure of the towers.

There are a few problems that I would like to point out with the official story right away:

1. Jet fuel does not burn at a high enough temperature to melt construction grade steel. Jet A burns at about 350 C in an open air environment. It can get as hot as 980 C in a controlled and optimal environment. The WTC steel was tested by UL at 2,000 C, and it retained its specification. It is not likely that an open air burn for less than an hour would have caused enough deformation to result in collapse - nor would the burning Jet A have gotten hot enough to melt the steel. In fact many other steel buildings have burned for hours upon hours with only superficial damage. The WTC twin towers and WTC building 7 would be the first, second, and third steel buildings ever to collapse due to fire.
2. The way the towers came down is consistent with a controlled demolition. Both towers fell into their own footprints at nearly free fall speeds. It simply does not make sense that the towers would have fallen through their own mass - through the path of highest resistance - unless the towers came down in a controlled demolition.

Many architects and physicists have gotten involved with the 9/11 truth movement for these very reasons. Too many experts simply cannot believe the official story.

I haven't even mentioned WTC building 7 yet, which also collapsed into its own footprint - even though it was not hit during the attacks. The evidence on building 7 alone is worth a separate article, so I will not cover it at this time.

We can find at least one answer in a PNAC document authored by Thomas Donnelly, entitled "Rebuilding America's Defenses." Section 5, "Creating Tomorrow's Dominant Force" had this to say:

"Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event––like a new Pearl Harbor"

Black flags or false flag operations are being used today to get the people behind the government, when their government wants to go to war or take military actions unnecessarily. Again, this is nothing new. In fact, I'm not even scratching the surface on this.

As with many of the articles that I will write, the body of evidence cannot be completely summed up in just one article. Rather, I would like to point you in the right direction - to films and/or documents that cover the issues more thoroughly.

This way, you don't have to take me at my word. The documentaries or documents that I am going to point you to have been very useful in opening my eyes, and my hope is that they will do the same for you. Welcome to reality.